Thursday, October 27, 2005

Being "Not Poor" in India: What Does it Mean?

First the Good News:
Yesterday, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, the Dy Chairman of Planning Commission, told the audience of Sardar Patel Memorial Lecture (organised by All India Radio) that at the present rate of growth (8%), India could well become the world's 3rd largest economic power by 2020.

Even better news was that by 2020 India will be able to eradicate poverty completely. He cited figures as to how the population "living" (to use a term, in the absense of a more apprpriate one) below poverty line has been decreasing - from 56% in 1973-74 to 39% (1987-88) to 37% (1993-94) to as low as 26% in 1999-2000... At the present rate of 1.6%/annum reduction in poor population, it will just take another 15 years to achieve this feat!!!
[one can almost imagine the thunderous applause at these pronouncements... After all he is an economist - not a politician who are given to rhetorics - and is quoting facts and figures]

...as if to vindicate his claim, earlier this month, the Sensex had broken through the 8000 magical number, and FDIs grew by 25% last year, and Indian exports are growing rapidly!!!

...and now the Slightly Not-So-Good News Analysis:

How does India define its poor? How do we calculate the "poverty line"?

To go back in the history, the first official announcement of poverty-line was made in 1978, during Morarji Desai's government. The calculation for poverty line was - and remains - simple: how much nutrition would a person need to stay alive?

According to Govt of India, a person requires 2,400 calories in rural areas, and 2,100 calories in the urban area. The money needed to buy grains worth that much calories is the Poverty Line.

In the 1970s, it used to be Rs 61.80/person/month for rural areas and Rs 71.30 for urban areas. Adjusting to inflation, now it has gone up to Rs 328 in rural areas and Rs 454 in urban areas (Congratulations!!, if you earn more than Rs 500/month in India, you are not among the poverty stricken masses!)

Notwithstanding the fact that (1) a healthy nourishment also includes protein, vitamins, minerals, etc., which are not factored in to calculate the poverty line, and (2) according to the the National Institute of Nutrition (part of Indian Council of Medical Research), Indians require more calories to survive (2,900 calories in rural, and 2,400 calories in urban India), there is something perplexing - and perverted - about this definition!

Essentially, it defines someone as "not poor" who is not starving to death!!!...

...that is: even if

  • I do not have a shelter to live in,
  • I own no assets, e.g., land, house, etc.
  • I maybe shivering to death,
  • I have no access to sanitation, have no job, no access to minimum education or health facilties...
    But as long as I am not dying of hunger, I am "not poor"!!!

    An article by the Center for Policy Alternatives, New Delhi, makes some revealing calculations to correct this anamoly.

    Imagine, the bare minimum needs of a "not poor" person: S/he lives in a family of five person (husband-wife, three children of 5, 10, and 15 age). Minimum nutrition. A small house (two rooms of 10'x10'). A bulb and fan in the rooms. A running tap in kitchen and bathroom. Clothes. Primary education for kids in the government-run subsidized schools. Basic healthcare.

    If one defines "poor" as someone not having this bare minimum, then the Indian "poverty line" needs to be set at Rs 1580/month/person!!... Or around Rs 7,900/month for a family of 5.

    And given the recent National Sample Survey data (i.e., 93% of Rural India spends less than Rs 950/person, and 83% of Urban India spends less than Rs 1500/person), apparently, more than 90% of Indians do not meet the above minimum definition of "not poor" - and are poor!!!

    But then, these are the inhabitants of the Invisible India...

    Sources:
    India Could Become Third Largest Economy
    Tripping over the Poverty Line
    Living in Two India(s)

  • 3 comments:

    Addled Philosopher said...

    Dear Sir,
    While that was a very insightful post, I do feel that the figures qouted in "Tripping over the poverty line" are quite exaggerated.
    Then again, the definition of poverty is a very subjective matter. (According to some, the poverty line in the bigger US cities is around $62,000 p.a.!!)
    I consider Rs 7900 a month to be too high because one finds such non-essentials as cable TV in many families earning less than that. Another reason is that, in 2001-02 (a bit dated, yes, though not too much), I stayed with 6 friends for 9 months while worknig in Noida. My expenditure on house (rent + maid +food and other common essentials including cable TV!) was only Rs.2500 a month, half of it being the house rent.
    Do keep writing such sir, you force us to think on these issues, and are an inspiration for us.
    Rgds

    Ajit said...

    Thanks for this great article. I only found this recently as I've begun to become more interested in poverty issues in India.

    Are you familiar with the recent NCEUS study? This blog analyzes parts of it:
    http://www.abrahamgeorge.blogspot.com/

    dghnfgj said...

    You said you will love me wow gold the whole life, but WoW Gold you marry her. You said you will wow power leveling,come to marry me, but this will not be carried out forever.WoW Gold I am trying my best to forget you and do not love you anymore. wow leveling But I failed and I still love you. Maybe wow leveling she needs you more compared wow leveling with me. So I tell you that world of warcraft power leveling you should love world of warcraft power leveling her and take good world of warcraft leveling care of her. You said I was so kind.world of warcraft leveling Yes, because I love you,world of warcraft leveling I hope you will be power leveling happy forever.