In the contemporary worldview, a belief and endorsement of "free trade/ market" - competition, level-playing field, removal of trade-barriers/ subsidies, etc. - has become a fashion statement of a liberal and modern mindset. It is also taken as a fact of life, since it is perpetuated by the popular mainstream media (which now also often includes management education and reports by investment analysts).
A couple of months back, this blog/newsletter had carried a posting about how the the rich and developed nations heavily subsidize their Farm and Agriculture (while at the same time, they put pressure on the less-developed countries to dismantle the subsidies on their agriculture and industry - through the "conditionalities" of loans given by the nations and multilateral agencies)
Even for the industry, the fact of subsidy holds. All global trade is subsidized (one may like to call it "incentivized") by developed countries
All developed countries have what are broadly called the ECAs (Export Credit Agencies), who provide lower-than-the-market loans to companies, loan guarantees for bad investments, low-risk financing for high-risk projects. These credits/loans allow the companies to export and market their products in other countries at a price lower than their manufacturing costs.
In US, for instance, (and am quoting this primarily, since US is a champion of "free-trade" cause), there are these various agencies/programs which serve this purpose:
etc.
This link lists 55 Corporate Welfare programs, inder different names, and their outlay in 1997:
http://www-hoover.stanford.edu/publications/epp/88/88d.html#table1
These program and agencies provide various kinds of subsidies and grants to businesses, e.g.,
One of the reports from Cato Institute estimates that during 1996-2002 these subsidies/incentives/ corporate welfare programs (have your pick for the term) amounted to $3.7tn - yes, $3.7 TRILLION!!! - that was doled out to american corporations... [essentially, meaning that a US company can market its produce at a price lower than its manufacturing cost!!!]
The "economic stimulus packages" which give tax breaks to large corporates, provide for further cushion. Interestingly, the benefits of this "stimulus" mostly go to large, successful and profitable corporations. A study found that between 1996-2000, just ten large profitable companies enjoyed a total of $50 billion in corporate tax breaks. That brought their combined tax bills down to only 8.9 percent of their profits over the five years (please note that in US for companies with taxable income of $10mn or above, the corpoate tax rate is 35% of taxable income). These were:
In addition, corporations - specially, the large ones - receive numerous subsidies from the states and local governments. Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele in an article (Corporate Welfare,The Time, Nov 9,1998) report:
"State and local governments now give corporations money to move from one city to another--even from one building to another--and tax credits for hiring new employees. They supply funds to train workers or pay part of their wages while they are in training, and provide scientific and engineering assistance to solve workplace technical problems. They repave existing roads and build new ones. They lend money at bargain-basement interest rates to erect plants or buy equipment. They excuse corporations from paying sales and property taxes and relieve them from taxes on investment income."
They go on to give some specific examples:
... and so on.
Needless to say, all this at the expense of the tax-payers' money...
I am sure what is true of US would also be true, in different degrees, for other developed economies... In fact, may even be true for the fast developing economies like China and India...
Yes, one may feel that all is not "fair" in the "free market economy"... But at least, now we do know how and why some "globally competitive companies" become gloablly competitive...
Sources:
http://www.cato.org/testimony/ct-sm060397.html
http://www.endgame.org/subsidies1.html
http://www.corporations.org/welfare/
http://www.ctj.org/html/corp0402.htm
http://www.socialconscience.com/articles/welfare/
http://www-hoover.stanford.edu/publications/epp/88/88a.html
http://www.time.com/time/archive/preview/0,10987,989508,00.html
Thursday, June 16, 2005
Subsidized Global "Free Trade" - II (Industry)
Posted by madhukar at Thursday, June 16, 2005
Labels: Capitalism, Globalisation
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment